Comments on: This Week in the Courts http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/ Personal Finances and Consumer Concerns, essays, stories, examples and how to articles with a distinctly Canadian Point of View Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:56:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: bigcajunman http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-1771 bigcajunman Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:05:47 +0000 http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=928#comment-1771 I don't think I will lose here either way, but getting the original price of $42 per share would be nice. --C8j I don’t think I will lose here either way, but getting the original price of $42 per share would be nice.

–C8j

]]> By: Mark S http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-1770 Mark S Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:41:05 +0000 http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=928#comment-1770 My guess is that you will win the bet. My guess is that you will win the bet.

]]> By: Big Cajun Man http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-1769 Big Cajun Man Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:14:02 +0000 http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=928#comment-1769 Either way it is going to be interesting. Even if the Supreme Court goes against the BCE sale, the moneys held back from the dividends might be the carrot that the bondholders are waiting for. -C8j Either way it is going to be interesting. Even if the Supreme Court goes against the BCE sale, the moneys held back from the dividends might be the carrot that the bondholders are waiting for.

-C8j

]]> By: Mark S http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-1767 Mark S Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:55:19 +0000 http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=928#comment-1767 Well Canajun, if you're a shareholder and Michael is guessing the bondholders will win out ... sounds like you might have a bet. Either way it will be very interesting and certainly precedent setting. I don't think the Supreme Court will compromise. It's their role to be decisive and unambiguous in order to be clear for future cases. Well Canajun, if you’re a shareholder and Michael is guessing the bondholders will win out … sounds like you might have a bet. Either way it will be very interesting and certainly precedent setting. I don’t think the Supreme Court will compromise. It’s their role to be decisive and unambiguous in order to be clear for future cases.

]]> By: michael James http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/06/20/this-week-in-the-courts/comment-page-1/#comment-1766 michael James Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:25:12 +0000 http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=928#comment-1766 My best guess is that the law is on the side of the bondholders, but I'm wondering if the Supreme Court will find some way to create a compromise. My best guess is that the law is on the side of the bondholders, but I’m wondering if the Supreme Court will find some way to create a compromise.

]]>