<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hazardous Waste Charges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/</link>
	<description>Personal Finances and Consumer Concerns, essays, stories, examples and how to articles with a distinctly Canadian Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hazardous Waste</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-4211</link>
		<dc:creator>Hazardous Waste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=1955#comment-4211</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to agree with Davids suggestion. Just add the cost for disposal to the purchase. It seems like such an easy solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to agree with Davids suggestion. Just add the cost for disposal to the purchase. It seems like such an easy solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry Hung</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-3507</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry Hung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=1955#comment-3507</guid>
		<description>I agree totally, it&#039;s crazy to PAY to recycle

Hence I would try Freecycle or simply leave items on the sidewalk for people to come get them
CRT&#039;s, Laser Printers, etc...

It costs $0 to put appliance on the curb, $3 per tire disposal, and $30 for 1 CRT? Mnn...

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jerry Hung’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jerryhung.com/2008/11/my-computermouse-right-hand-is-colder.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My computer/mouse right hand is colder than my left. I am a freak!!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally, it&#8217;s crazy to PAY to recycle</p>
<p>Hence I would try Freecycle or simply leave items on the sidewalk for people to come get them<br />
CRT&#8217;s, Laser Printers, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>It costs $0 to put appliance on the curb, $3 per tire disposal, and $30 for 1 CRT? Mnn&#8230;</p>
<p><abbr><em>Jerry Hung’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.jerryhung.com/2008/11/my-computermouse-right-hand-is-colder.html" rel="nofollow">My computer/mouse right hand is colder than my left. I am a freak!!</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DAvid</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-3506</link>
		<dc:creator>DAvid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=1955#comment-3506</guid>
		<description>Hazardous waste charges should be included in the purchase price of the product, and a reward paid upon proper disposal, similar to bottle returns. We are usually willing to pay this small cost at time of purchase, due to the perceived value of the product. At the end of it&#039;s lifespan, we see no value, and are enraged at the &#039;prohibitive&#039; disposal costs.

DAvid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazardous waste charges should be included in the purchase price of the product, and a reward paid upon proper disposal, similar to bottle returns. We are usually willing to pay this small cost at time of purchase, due to the perceived value of the product. At the end of it&#8217;s lifespan, we see no value, and are enraged at the &#8216;prohibitive&#8217; disposal costs.</p>
<p>DAvid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael James</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-3505</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=1955#comment-3505</guid>
		<description>A sensible solution is to have a government run location that accepts hazardous waste at no extra charge, but to charge an extra tax when a new item is purchased.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Michael James’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MichaelJamesOnMoney/~3/g203YYPQKQI/hedge-fund-conflict-of-interest.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Hedge Fund Conflict of Interest&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sensible solution is to have a government run location that accepts hazardous waste at no extra charge, but to charge an extra tax when a new item is purchased.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Michael James’s last blog post..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MichaelJamesOnMoney/~3/g203YYPQKQI/hedge-fund-conflict-of-interest.html" rel="nofollow">Hedge Fund Conflict of Interest</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traciatim</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2008/11/25/hazardous-waste-charges/comment-page-1/#comment-3504</link>
		<dc:creator>Traciatim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=1955#comment-3504</guid>
		<description>Here is an opposite, equally effective, revenue generating solution. Put an import fee in place equal to the wage gap between overseas workers, including all benefits received, in comparison with domestic auto workers. If the country of assembly has employees that cost 30% lower than here then a 30% import fee it is.

Th unions would love it, and it would put the domestics on par with the slave labour imports. Also, it would enable &#039;imports&#039; that have local factories to compete on par using domestic to North America workers.

Of course, instead of that you could just let the big three use chapter 11 to get the unions off their back and suddenly they would be profitable anyway once fair competition re-prices the work force . . . but that&#039;s a whole other discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an opposite, equally effective, revenue generating solution. Put an import fee in place equal to the wage gap between overseas workers, including all benefits received, in comparison with domestic auto workers. If the country of assembly has employees that cost 30% lower than here then a 30% import fee it is.</p>
<p>Th unions would love it, and it would put the domestics on par with the slave labour imports. Also, it would enable &#8216;imports&#8217; that have local factories to compete on par using domestic to North America workers.</p>
<p>Of course, instead of that you could just let the big three use chapter 11 to get the unions off their back and suddenly they would be profitable anyway once fair competition re-prices the work force . . . but that&#8217;s a whole other discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
