<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank Access Good or Bad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.canajunfinances.com/2009/01/26/bank-access-good-or-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2009/01/26/bank-access-good-or-bad/</link>
	<description>Personal Finances and Consumer Concerns, essays, stories, examples and how to articles with a distinctly Canadian Point of View</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:56:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Money Minder</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2009/01/26/bank-access-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-3964</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Minder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=2188#comment-3964</guid>
		<description>This is a win-win situation all around for the banks.  They get to reduce overhead by having fewer branches fully staffed for fewer hours and charge higher service fees for teller services while also dinging clients for ABM transactions and debit card purchases.  

Consumers may be more conscious of their spending if they had to go to a bank to get cash before they could purchase something, but that would mean way less revenue for the banks (and dividend for those who invest in banks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a win-win situation all around for the banks.  They get to reduce overhead by having fewer branches fully staffed for fewer hours and charge higher service fees for teller services while also dinging clients for ABM transactions and debit card purchases.  </p>
<p>Consumers may be more conscious of their spending if they had to go to a bank to get cash before they could purchase something, but that would mean way less revenue for the banks (and dividend for those who invest in banks).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gene</title>
		<link>http://www.canajunfinances.com/2009/01/26/bank-access-good-or-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-3963</link>
		<dc:creator>gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.canajunfinances.com/?p=2188#comment-3963</guid>
		<description>Imagine a world where our cell phones had a coin slot on them and we had to plug a quarter in it every minute while using it. I think cell phone use would drop dramatically, since it would become a conscious decision to use it.

My intuition is that if we lived in a cash-driven economy, we would be far more sparing with our purchases.  So, with regards to banks, we&#039;d be more frugal with limited access to cash, especially if we also got rid of debit and credit cards, and cheques.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a world where our cell phones had a coin slot on them and we had to plug a quarter in it every minute while using it. I think cell phone use would drop dramatically, since it would become a conscious decision to use it.</p>
<p>My intuition is that if we lived in a cash-driven economy, we would be far more sparing with our purchases.  So, with regards to banks, we&#8217;d be more frugal with limited access to cash, especially if we also got rid of debit and credit cards, and cheques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
