Given it is a busy summer (OK a lazy summer) here is another chestnut from my early writings (2005) interesting points made, not sure I completely agree with it now, but it is still an interesting read (in my early writings I seem to rant about things, which is fun to read sometimes too).
I read that one on the Alan Baggett news site, and scratched my head but it is actually how the tax system is set up currently. If I divorce my wife and pay her Alimony (not child support, remember that case a while back, where that is taxed in the payers hands) I can effectively split my income.
I remember having this argument that in the Government’s eyes the following scenario would be ideal:
OK, ok, this is a ridiculous scenario (and I’m sure some might even claim illegal, although I’d love to see that taken to court), but this is how SCREWED UP the entire Canadian Tax System is! I checked this with Quicktax and it was quite happy to show me the obscene amount of tax I’d save.
Alan’s tax writings are an interesting read, as are his stories (they are a little “he said, she said” which at times I am not fond of), but still interesting to read how some people are persecuted by the Tax system, while others get off “scott free”.
Please let me repeat, I do not condone the above tax sharing concept (but if you get away with it drop me a line, I’d be curious to hear).