Canadian Personal Finance Blog

That is what Stats Canada says, which is not surprising, but the fact that it was only 2.2% amazes me a little. In 2006 the CPI was 2.0% so this is not a large jump in the CPI year over year, however, as I keep saying the impact of sky rocketing energy prices is still to be shaken out of the market.

Housing in 2007 seems mostly to blame for higher prices, but energy started having an effect by the end of the year as well:

Price increases for basic and frequently-purchased commodities, like food, also fuelled consumer prices in 2007. However, price declines for a number of commodities, particularly several of those less frequently purchased, such as new vehicles and computer equipment, mitigated the rise in consumer prices. Faced with higher prices for frequently-purchased commodities and lower prices for those not frequently purchased, consumers might perceive that inflation was increasing at a faster pace than measured by aggregate inflation.

Interesting view on things, wonder how important vehicles are going to be in the future? Will there be a glut coming soon, or will the Asian continent simply pick up the slack?

Very interesting indeed, this year is going to be a very different kettle of fish.

Politeness Wins Out

One of the Mantras that I espouse on this humble site is to be Polite when dealing with Customer Service folks in specific and with most folks in general (remember being Polite to Police is very important). Yesterday another example of speaking to someone who you want to fix something in a polite way helps out again.

My eldest just graduated from High School and we are very proud, however, we noticed she didn’t get an Ontario Scholar “tag” in her graduation. Given her previous marks we were alarmed to think what might have happened to her marks to cause this inability to keep her average at the correct level (80% for 6 Grade 12 courses).

I decided after discussing (calmly) with my daughter that there must have been a mistake, so I called the school and asked in a polite way if someone could look into this for me, and sure enough it was an error on their part and they are rectifying the situation. I was very thankful to the woman who called me back, but it again shows that acting in an aggressive or rude fashion rarely gets you what you want (unless you are a loan shark), but with a little politeness and courteousness you’d be surprised what can happen.

Happy long weekend to my Canadian readers (ok EXTRA long weekend, since you have to take Monday off to really make it a long weekend).

BCE Decision Today at 4:30 PM

Care to wager a few shillings on the results? I am sure that is what a few traders will be doing, in either direction, with the Supreme Court ready to bring down a decision on an appeal of the Quebec Supreme Court’s ruling stopping the BCE sale. This ruling will either kill the sale or put it back on track for now. As a share holder, I would hope the sale would continue, but who knows what the highest court in the land might decide.

The Nortel Three and their Day in Court

Frank Dunn, Douglas Beatty and Michael Gollogly had their arraignment in court yesterday under Fraud charges brought by the RCMP. This is interesting to me, since I lived through those days, and am curious now to hear about what exactly may have transpired during that time at Nortel.

What happened to cause all employees to get their “Return to profitability” bonus? I will be reading the coverage of this case very closely.

Important to note that Nortel the company is not part of these proceedings as a defendant, and they have stated they are co-operating fully with the RCMP investigation.

The Globe and Mail Report:

The RCMP alleged Mr. Dunn, Mr. Beatty and Mr. Gollogly fraudulently misstated Nortel’s results. Among the accusations are that the three “made false entries and omitted materials particular in the books and documents in regards to the financial results of Nortel.”

It will be very interesting to see how this is proven in court, or refuted, because I suspect this is going to get into some very technical aspects of Corporate Accounting Practices in Canada. I have had some of this explained to me, and I can say as a non-accountant, it is very confusing.

Rates Staying the Same

So what did the new Governor of the Bank of Canada know that we didn’t last week when he refused to lower rates, when the majority of experts were sure the rates were going to drop? Maybe he figured out that Inflation might be coming back, like we found out yesterday?  Does Mark Carney have a good crystal ball, or good information collecting skills? Either way, looks like he hit the nail on the head with that call last week.

Given Scotiabank, TD and BMO are raising their long term Mortgage Rates, makes me wonder what they might know as well?

Bank of Canada Stays Pat

Experts, shmexperts! All the major sites were calling for a cut to 2.75% on the overnight rate, well the Bank of Canada saw some sense and held their ground and did not cut the rates this time. I think this is a good idea given the Inflation Boogie Man is out there and I suspect he is going to come and stay for a while too!

The comment from the Bank of Canada States:

If current levels of energy prices persist, total CPI inflation will rise above 3 per cent later this year. However, with the Canadian economy operating in excess supply, core inflation is expected to remain below 2 per cent through 2009. Both total and core inflation should converge on 2 per cent in 2010 as the economy returns to balance.

Against this backdrop, the Bank now judges that the current stance of monetary policy is appropriately accommodative to bring aggregate demand and supply into balance and to achieve the 2 per cent inflation target. There continue to be important downside and upside risks to inflation in Canada, which the Bank will monitor closely.

Mortgage That’s the Ticket!

In my humble opinion, for me, I should be paying down my mortgage and debt load, and not concentrating on my retirement.

Until about 1 year ago, I had the potential to get a very good pension from my employer (the pension was capped and a new pension system put in place, although I still have some equity built up in my now capped pension), so I was actually investing heavily in a Spousal RRSP to ensure an income splitting model when I retire.

Currently I save about 8% of my income in RRSP or retirement funds (without including the new Pension that I am currently part of, that I am not sure what value it has yet).

Saving 8% annually approaches what I should be saving for my retirement as a minimum (last I heard most “experts” said 10% is a minimum you should save for your retirement). I suspect I am ok for retirement, whatever that actually means to me (given I don’t think I can retire for a long time, due to family commitments).

Wait a Minute, you said….

What do I mean by the title of this post then? I actually am on the “RRSP That’s the Ticket” side of the question of whether to invest in your retirement or pay off your debts? My answer is I think I made a mistake, and should have been much more aggressively paying off my debt load (which is not as low as it should be currently).

I make this statement as my opinion of how my debt load is affecting me. Let me be clear, carrying debt is making me sick, it keeps me up at night, it distracts me and worries me every day since I went into debt many years ago. I am confident this worry has affected my health directly, worrying about this debt and the scenarios that come from still carrying this debt, this late in my working career.

What should I be doing now is the next interesting question? I think I need to sit down with my wife and figure out how to change all of this, but we were going to do that anyhow given it is almost the end of this home finance quarter.