Monday I spent a good 2 hours with a Personal Finance Planner, that was made available to me by my soon to be former employer, and their right management team. I won’t divulge the name of the planner, just because I don’t feel right doing a “review” of their services, since I got them for a large discount.
The scope of my discussions with this gentleman was mostly around what are my options to do with my severance package and what the tax implications would be if I withdrew from my company’s pension plan.
Bill (not the financial planners real first name) collected a fair amount of background information from us, which made my wife a little nervous (since she had not met him before, but I had at a group financial planning session). We were fairly strict in what we did and did not tell him, since we wanted the scope of the discussions to stay mostly around the task at hand (i.e. tax implications of my severance package).
After collecting the information, the financial planner had an already set up Excel spreadsheet with the tax scenarios possible for me and my family. Bill has done this with many (more than 100) former employees of my soon to be former employer. He also had a massive plasma display that he ran this on to show my wife and I what he was calculating. My wife pointed out I will never be getting a display like that for my computer.
He started by filling in some of the numbers he gave me about my yearly income, the size of the severance package, and the size of my pension pay out.
The variables to be dealt with are:
The financial planner went through all of these scenarios, gave his opinions and dealt with my and my wife’s questions in a professional way.
I think my wife and I had already decided what to do, but we didn’t really have a clear plan of why or how much, I think now we do (at least I hope we do). Simply sitting down with someone with enough Tax savvy and background to “bounce ideas” off was just great and I think I got my moneys worth out of it (remember I got this at a large discount).
Bill did point out that his company does offer many services, and that if I did need them, I should call him (and I wouldn’t expect anything less from a small business owner), but he was not pushy and understood the audience he was dealing with.
Bill also told me his hourly rate, and I think I might think a bit before going back to him, and make sure I was much better prepared than I was this time, because his services do not come cheap (but then again, you pay for expertise, I have always found).
All in all a positive experience, and I would recommend dealing with a financial planner, with NO ties to any insurance company or mutual fund company. Make sure the planner charges you by the hour, for the service he is offering, so you know where he or she is making their money (mostly).
As I am cleaning up my blog (and making sure all of my links work) I find some interesting gems that I had forgotten that I had written. The following is a classic Rant from me Pay Day Loans: No, No, No!!!!. I have added a fun charicature of the Pay Day Loans business as well (the Great White Shark).
As most of my regular readers know, I tend to get a twitch and rant loudly when talking about payday loans and the places that give out this “alternate credit vehicle” (a term used by the industry). I have pontificated about this point many times, but now Stats Canada has put out a study about the growth of this financial alternative, and also who uses it. Perspectives on Labour and Income examines this whole industry in detail, but Stats Canada has put up a good summary on their web site about it.
Three percent (3%) of families in Canada have admitted to using these kind of services in the past 3 years. The family’s main bread winner is typically between 35 and 44, which is also interesting (non baby boomers, more like Generation X’ers).
This quote makes me feel very sad:
Almost half of families who used payday loans reported that they had no one to turn to if they faced financial difficulty, significantly higher than for non-users (32%). More than one-quarter reported that they could not handle an unforeseen expenditure of $500, almost four times the rate for non-users. Nearly half could not handle one of $5,000 (17% for non-users).
Yikes, that really does mean we are living a little too close to the ragged edge these days and really need to think about how we spend our money.
I am not condemning you for using this service, but I do want you to think about how you can stop using these services. There are many different ideas out there on many different blogs and books you can get from your library, so please start a plan. Don’t feel like this is your only way to deal with this, because these Loan Sharks are not the answer to your financial survival, if anything they are the end of your survival, there is little chance of escape from these sharks. If you are paying 470% interest, your chances of getting out from under this is not likely.
What I am learning is that Free Advice, and advice in general should always be viewed from the context it is being given to you.
An example of this is I was told when I was laid off, “Don’t tell anyone about this…”, as soon as I heard that I went “WTF“? Why wouldn’t I tell people? Me telling people has got me more “job leads”, helpful hints, positive reinforcement and general niceties, than I could ever have dreamed of, so that was very bad “free” advice.
If I get “great” advice from a Mutual Fund salesman about what funds I should buy, should I take that advice at face value? Of course not, it may well be the best advice, but you must take into context of where the advice is coming from. If an insurance sales person tells me I should buy Whole Life insurance to protect my family, is that good advice? Not really, at least not in my opinion.
I always preface any advice I might give for any reason with, “Your mileage may vary”, or something to that effect, because what has worked for me, is not guaranteed to work for anyone else in the same situation.
Then you have other great advice, like from Drippy Chick, who pointed me at www.petersnewjobs.com to get on the mailing list for jobs in Ottawa in Toronto, fantastic advice (I’d already subscribed to it, but good advice, no doubt).
Lots of great investing and financial advice from N.C.F.B.A. and other good financial blogging sites, but again, remember you are getting that advice for free, so remember that point as well.
As I mentioned last week we purchased a new camera last week and didn’t get the extended warranty.
This past Friday (6 days after purchasing the camera), I read the Future Shop flyer and saw that the same camera is now selling for $50.00 less. I tend to read the Future Shop and Best Buy flyers because I am a techno-geek and like to window shop for things I can’t afford (and know I shouldn’t buy), and this time it paid off very nicely.
I went off to Best Buy, and was my normal polite self, I had my bill with me from the previous Saturday and spoke to the young lady at the Customer Service (sic) desk (I also brought a copy of the Future Shop Ad for the camera). The young lady was very polite as well and then checked and Best Buy was in fact carrying my Camera (Canon S5 IS) for $50.00 less also, and because of this my account was credited for $56.50 (after tax rebates and such).
Well worth the trip, even though I most likely spent $4.00 worth of petroleum to get my money, but money well retrieved. Most electronics stores, and I believe most big box stores (aka Wal-Mart) have this kind of purchase protection plan and it is important to make sure you are not being over-charged and you are taking advantage of later sales on products you have purchased.
I am thinking now, I should have raised a mild stink and asked for more than $50.00 back, because the sales person at Best Buy should have known this camera was going to be on sale in the next few days, but I didn’t think of it at the time.
As I stood in line I saw another interesting piece of consumer sleuthing that I feel it is important to report on as well.
A young lady was in front of me, and she had her iPOD touch with her, and there was some issue with it not working correctly. The young lady had her original box, and her extended warranty (which we said she paid $70 for (I believe)), and the Customer Service rep was very polite and said she’d have a look at it.
The Customer Service rep then told her something that caused my ear hear to prick up. Evidently if the Best Buy Customer rep couldn’t repair or make the iPOD work successfully, the young lady (customer) would have to send it to Apple, because it is within a year of purchase and Apple does all repairs in the first year.
Let that sink in, the customer has purchased an extended warranty from Best Buy, however, Apple’s warranty covers the exact same repair in the first year (presumably the first year of the extended warranty as well).
Read that previous sentence again, and tell me you didn’t at least have a “WTF” moment.
What is the use of this “Extended Warranty” if Apple repairs this and not Best Buy? The Customer Service rep in fact said, the customer must send the iPOD back to Apple, because Apple will not accept the iPOD if it is sent in by Best Buy. Another “WTF” moment for me.
So the extended warranty you purchase overlaps with Apple’s, and is effectively redundant (i.e. useless).