bybigcajunmanoriginally published onNovember 13, 2016
I was saddened to hear that Leonard Cohen, yet another famous Montrealer has passed on, but his music will leave a legacy that will live long past all of us.
A Poet and a Canadian Treasure Link to Amazon
Mr. Cohen, unfortunately, was also a victim of losing his retirement nest-egg. In 2005, the news of how Mr. Cohen’s retirement funds had disappeared, allegedly due to impropriety from a former manager came to the public eye. Mr. Cohen, lost over $5 million dollars, and was forced to go back to work. Luckily, Mr. Cohen’s talents allowed him to try to recover from this set back, however, it meant his retirement evaporated.
We are continually barraged with stories of athletes and celebrities who have lost their money, due to financial impropriety (or even worse, simple overspending), but don’t get too smug.
It is easy for us to say, this won’t happen to me, but as a former Nortel employee, many folks I worked with (and retirees that I know) have had to dramatically change their retirement plans due to the Nortel Pension (and Stock) collapse.
bybigcajunmanoriginally published onSeptember 16, 2015
… if you are under the age of 18. If you are older than 18, why are you still living with your parents, better still, why do you want to move back in with your parents ?
I grow weary reading these self-help articles for new grads (or worse 30 year olds who have dugg too deep a debt hole or young couples trying to “build up a nest-egg”) suggesting that your parents would love to open up their house to their adult children. We are talking about children who have lived away from home (for a while) that are now moving back home, to live with their parents, who have also enjoyed an empty nest (most likely). (I am not speaking of kids who need to stay with their parents due to disabilities or other issues similar to that, I am not that much of an Ogre).
Question: Do you want your parents to move in with you after their “nest egg” ends up exhausted because they had to support you between the ages of 25 and 30 ? Think about it, turn about is fair play in this world, especially when it comes to you invading your parents Golden Years.
This sounds like a rather parsimonious opinion, but when did it become a badge of courage to live with your parents? I must admit, that I am a hypocrite on this matter, as I lived with my parents during most of my work terms, when I was a co-op students, however, once I graduated, I did not move back home. This did not mean I did not want to live at home, but, I also knew my parents had done their job with me. They had made sure I had a degree and they had taught me all they could, and yes, they have helped me in life financially, but I have not moved back in with them.
A Badge for Those Contemplating Moving Back Home
When I was younger, kids wanted to move away from home, and be an adult, when did staying a kid become a status symbol?
I suppose if you are in dire straights, and this is your only option, your parents will want to help however, here are a few helpful hints and tips if you are planning on moving back in with your parents:
You may have grown up in your parents house, but it is no longer your home, you are now a lodger, treat this house accordingly.
Pay rent (if you can), and pay board if your parents are feeding you, allowing you to use their utilities, and giving you a space to live in.
Show your parents you are “saving” or “getting out of debt”, give them a feeling that you are trying to help yourself, you are not simply giving up. Your parents want to support you, and they will be happy to hear of your progress.
If you have a car, get rid of it (and no that doesn’t mean you can borrow your parents car). If you can afford to have a car, you can afford not to live with your parents. Worse don’t ask your parents to support your “car habit”.
Respect your parents privacy. Make sure you allocate time to NOT to be in your parents house. Your parents will thank you for it.
Big Cajun Man Lemma of Baby Boom Retirement
Kippers will be the death of the baby boom generation.
What does this have to do with retirement planning? Everything!
Many folks are planning for a retirement, but don’t have a number in mind, about how long this money is supposed to last, which could cause problems later in life (said Captain Obvious).
Time is Always Ticking
For those planning their retirement with a Pension as the cornerstone of their Golden Years, how long you live is not as important, because you will have income as long as you keep breathing (and your pension plan does the same (remember Nortel)), but if you are planning on creating a Big Bucket of Money that you will then draw from for your retirement, you need to figure out when you are going to “pack it in”.
The other advantage a pensioner has, is that the pension payments won’t (or at least shouldn’t) decrease in value . They may decrease in value if the pension is not indexed against inflation, but unless another Nortel situation arises, most pensions shouldn’t drop in value, however, those who have a Big Bucket of Money, they have to live that delicate balance of having growth in the “Big Bucket”, but careful growth so that value is mostly lost from withdrawal (and not losing value).
So what should your “lifespan” number be? How long did your parents live for, that would be a good barometer (as long as there aren’t mitigating circumstances like smoking or being hit by a truck) to start your calculations. Maybe add 10% to your parents age, due to better medical systems? It’s all up to you, but if you want to do as Preet advises might be better to overestimate how much money you will need.
bybigcajunmanoriginally published onFebruary 11, 2015
What is Healthy Retirement ?
“…Those who don’t have time for exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness…” –Unknown
In conversation I used this phrase on a co-worker a few days ago, and they gave me a blank stare in reply. I keep trying to get across to my younger co-workers and peers that retirement planning in terms of your finances is essential (although as Civil Servants, not as hard, due to the current Pension Plan), but, no matter how much money you save, if you are too sick (or worse dead), it means nothing. The most important advice I can give for retirement is Don’t Die, before you can retire, and I think this point really does need to be driven home.
Seasick Steve’s Album at Amazon
Why do I go to the gym these days? To help keep my knees usable, and to make sure my heart stays in relatively good shape. In my younger days, I wanted to look fit, but “the look” matters little to me (now). I want to be able to walk and I don’t want to end up bed ridden in my “golden years”.
Seasick Steve ?
Coincidentally, I was listening to an album from Seasick Steve, and there is one song on there that really drives the point home about retirement, and I urge you to listen to “What a Way to Go“. I heard that song, went home and hopped on my exercise bike. Listen to it on the iTunes store link (above), it says it all about retirement in one catchy song (and it is aimed at Civil Servants or anyone with a Pension). Here is the verse that drove it home for me:
The day of retirement have finally come Get a gold watch and your work is done One month later your heart give out What was all that planning about?
Oh and one other acidic piece of advice for my readers that still smoke, save yourself some money by not saving for your retirement, enjoy your money now, because you aren’t going to need it. The other side of the coin is, I hope you have a medical plan for your retirement, because (if you make it to your retirement) you are going to need THAT! How dare I say that? I watched my Father smoke, and his retirement was spent in a wheelchair, was it caused by his smoking? I think so. You want to do something for your retirement? Quit smoking, put your smokes money in a retirement account and start exercising, it might not be too late. First comment that says, “… it’s my body…”, gets the Second Hand Smoke boot in the groin award (I worked for a tobacco company I have a good idea what is in those things).
bybigcajunmanoriginally published onNovember 25, 2014
I am borrowing an expression that David Lewis made about Canadian Corporations getting far too many tax breaks (his phrase was “Corporate Welfare Bums“), however, I feel it is correct, given the furor in the main stream media about Rich Canadians getting fat off Retirement Welfare (again to paraphrase and add alarmist tenor to the argument).
Typical Rich Fat Cat Canadian™ lying around with his TFSA and his tax loopholes!
This all seems to be a reaction to The Harper Government™ proposing (or maybe only socializing) a doubling of the current TFSA yearly limit to $11K, and thus the fear of “Rich Fat Cat Canadians™” taking advantage of this unfair change to hide income and possibly end up getting paid the Guaranteed Income Supplement if they retire (GIS is really to help those who are retired with lower-income, if you have a higher income it typically is clawed back). This is diabolical, someone who could save $11,000 a year until they retire might appear to be a pauper and attempt to get government hand outs? How dare they exploit this “tax loophole” ! #OMG
Now let’s all calm the heck down given I have just whipped you into a fury of moral indignation about the Rich Fat Cat Canadians™ out there. My guess would be that the government (as part of announcing the doubling of the TFSA limit (possibly)) will simply force folks applying for GIS to report their TFSA holdings, and that will then disqualify them from getting the GIS , but if you believe what is being currently written, it is happening right now, and the Harper Government™ is doing nothing about it! #OMG
This (of course) is not likely the case, but having a higher TFSA limit does make for some very interesting questions about where to put your Retirement funds, especially if you are younger (for someone like me, I have about 10 years before retirement, if they DID double the rate and I DID max out my TFSA‘s I could have about $140K or so (with growth) in my TFSA). I have seen many interesting arguments on both sides, and I am not completely sure which is better, however, I will be proposing tomorrow (teaser) an interesting hybrid solution (that is neither brilliant nor new, just me rehashing old ideas (as usual)).
So all you Rich Fat Cat Canadians™ can thank the Harper Government™ for yet another break being given to you, you oppressors of the proletariat
Full Disclosure: I believe if I use the definition of Rich Fat Cat Canadians™ I must disclose that I am (most likely, depending on the income line used) a member of this club too, and yes this article was written (a little) tongue in cheek.