What is Couch Potato Investing?

I had a friend ask me this question, What is Couch Potato Investing, and for those starting out, it may not be obvious what I mean when I talk about this variant of an investing concept. I present to you a simplistic primer on Couch Potato Investing.

Couch Potato Investing

Happy Couch Potato Investors

The Couch Potato Investor label is actually quite descriptive, in that it describes investors who do not wish to be bothered by day-to-day investing issues, they simply want to set up their investments and occasionally come back and take simple actions on the investments in place (in military terms, fire and forget).

Most of the time, Couch Potato Investors are typically Index Investors (i.e. they are not investing in individual stocks, or investment vehicles, they will invest in an area), thus single day changes in the markets become less of a concern (to quote a well-known investor, “I am an indexer, I don’t care what the Index did today”). I suppose you could be an individual stock investor and be a couch potato, but you’d have to buy something like Berkshire-Hathaway or something like that.

How big or small your portfolio ends up being, is up to you. It is possible to have the greatest couch potato portfolio, which is a two Index Fund (yes, that is possible), but others might argue that you are not diversified enough, and should have more diversity, so typically your portfolio ends up being:

  • Canadian Index – to invest in your country and such
  • US Index – you may as well invest in the economy that is mostly driving the world’s economy
  • International Index – this is murkier water, as there really is no definitive index, so you will need to do some research in this area
  • A GIC-like fund or a Bond Fund – remember Bonds can go down in value in the short-term
  • Maybe a REIT of some kind (but not for a specific city, or you might really get burned when the inevitable correction happens)
  • Cash? Cash is always nice to have around, but don’t put it in your mattress

How much of each you buy is up to you, but keep track of your initial investment percentages, because you will need to re-balance your portfolio (so you take your profits on occasion). What is re-balancing? Every little while (a period you choose typically either every quarter, 6 months or yearly), you look at your portfolio and either:

  • Add funds to the portfolio, to get back to your original investment percentages, by buying more of the lower total value indexes.
  • Sell off higher valued indexes and buy lower valued indexes to get back to your original investment percentages

That is about it, you re-balance, and you sit back on your Couch and eat potato chips, watch Netflix and Relax.

This is meant as a simply primer on the topic, there are many great articles written by other folks outlining good Couch Potato portfolios (using either Index Funds or ETFs) that you can research and simply choose which one you are comfortable using.

{ 8 comments }

{ 8 comments… add one }
  • Grant July 23, 2016, 6:28 PM

    Cannew, one certainly cannot argue with the success of your strategy in that it allowed you to reach your goals, so whether you would have done as well or better with a passive index portfolio doesn’t really matter at this point. But here’s the thing. When advising young investors what strategy they should follow, it’s important to suggest the strategy that has the highest probability of maximizing returns. You ran a concentrated portfolio in Canada’s very small market and it turned out very well over that period of time. Over the next 30 years it may not turn out so well, because it is not well diversified, or it may turn out even better, no one knows. The research shows that it is passive indexing that offers the highest probability of an optimal outcome going forward.

    Reply
    • bigcajunman July 23, 2016, 6:48 PM

      Well put Grant, as you point out, you can’t argue against a strategy that has worked, however, I can argue that stock picking is a dangerous game (given the financial scars I have).

      Reply
      • cannew July 29, 2016, 8:44 AM

        Hi Grant:

        Agreed that no one can foresee the future and what worked for me may not work for others, or suit others. But as I still hold those stocks and they continue to preform well than that’s the key. As long as they do as they have in the past, continue to increase their earnings and my income, than the strategy is working. If and when the next crisis occurs that will be next test. Will they continue as they have in previous crisis, to pay and raise their dividend.
        As with all strategies they should be monitored to see if they continue to meet your criteria for buying them.

        Reply
  • cannew July 23, 2016, 2:10 PM

    “I suppose you could be an individual stock investor and be a couch potato, but you’d have to buy something like Berkshire-Hathaway or something like that.”

    Been retired for many years and only found success with our investments when we stopped trading, stock picking, re-balancing and taking profits. We followed the Connolly Report strategy, which is to select from a select group of solid DG stocks which have a long history of paying and increasing their dividend. We settled on 20 stocks, added to just those and held for the growing income. Were we diversified, No. Did we own all sectors, No. Did we match or beat market returns, ??, because our focus was on the generating of income, which grew and continued to grow and still grows.

    Would have done as well with a passive index portfolio, who knows. I certainly would not have held over half of the stocks listed in the etf’s I’ve viewed. What I do know is that by following the strategy we did, we were able to retire financially secure and our income is such that we will never have to touch principal unless we wish.

    Reply
  • David Leonhardt July 21, 2016, 2:35 PM

    Set it and forget it!

    Reply
  • Grant July 19, 2016, 11:13 AM

    I wouldn’t say that the two fund portfolio is not diversified enough – it has thousands of stocks from all around the world, including Canada, and also includes some Reits. It’s difficult to get more diversified than that. Sure, it doesn’t hold any bonds, but you own bonds to smooth the ride, which, true, most people need to do, but if you have nerves of steel and can handle the volatility of an all equity portfolio, bonds are not necessary.

    Reply
    • bigcajunman July 19, 2016, 1:09 PM

      Agreed, the folks I know that are experienced investors seem to view an “all equity” portfolio (i.e. Index based ETFs or Funds) as the way to go. Does anyone use CSBs any more (that is under the age of 60)?

      Reply
  • bigcajunman July 19, 2016, 10:19 AM

    There are a lot of good links to other Bloggers who have lots of information on this, like Preet B., Canadian Couch Potato, Boomer & Echo and Squawkfox gives you a nifty rebalancing spreadsheet too! Click away!

    Reply

Leave a Comment

*

%d bloggers like this: